Barry Yasika wrote: 25 Nov 2025 10:34 am
I keep hearing comments directed at AI. But AI is just AI, it does nothing without a prompt from a user. Whatever involvement AI has in an assisted song is entirely in the hands of the person who chooses to use it, whether for help or for creation. AI itself is not the problem; the real issue is how much influence the end user allows it to have in the material. To sum it up: AI is not the problem. this is a people problem.
This point needed to be made in the discussion. Thank you, Barry.
A few days ago, I read that an “AI artist” is now at the top of the R&B charts, and her “creator” was awarded a $3M recording contract.
Many of us have worked with programs like Band In A Box, iRealPro, Jammer, whatever, to either assist in the creative process of original music or simply as practice tools. AI takes it a step further by offering someone with absolutely zero musical training or talent the power to create what would take a competent human artist years or even decades to develop the ability to do, right down to the actual performance of the material.
I see this leading to a situation where anyone can use a device to create the music they want to hear spontaneously and almost instantly at any particular moment, without having to search Spotify or Apple Music or paying royalties to some music publishing behemoth.
The question for musicians remains the same - how do we find work? And how nuts are you going to have to be to spend years developing a skill that will be competing with a machine that any idiot can program in a few keystrokes to do a very close simulation of what you do. Good luck, kids.